Atiku vs Buhari: Opposition political parties fire back at Supreme Court, make fresh allegations
The Coalition of United Political Parties, CUPP, has said that the Supreme Court attack on it (CUPP) is a confirmation of its earlier claim that there was an unholy alliance of the apex court and the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC.
CUPP insisted that there was an ongoing plan to alter the order of appointing Presidential Election Appeal Panel and handpick the members.
The apex court had earlier described CUPP’s claim as “Blatant falsehood, misinformation and malicious rumour being generously peddled.”
The court warned the party to stopwhat it termed occhestrated falsehood and campaign of calumny.
However, in a statement signed and made available to DAILY POST on Tuesday by Ikenga Imo Ugochinyere, its Publicity Secretary, which is in response to the warning by the apex court, the coalition told the Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, that he will hear more from them.
The statement added, “The Coalition of United Political Parties (CUPP) has again read with dismay a statement credited to the Supreme Court in which the apex court that is expected to be neutral on all issues descended heavily on the coalition for alerting Nigerians on the issue that concerns them and the nation.
“The Supreme Court has by that statement successfully descended into the arena, has taken sides and has decided to join issues with the opposition perhaps because the supposed quiet plan and alliance with the APC led Federal Government had been botched.
“The CUPP and opposition have before now exposed the plan to alter the order of seniority which is used in appointing Supreme Court justices that sit on presidential appeal since 1979. We had insisted that the plan is to truncate the appeal filed by the Coalition consensus candidate and Presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar.
It is noteworthy that the attack on CUPP by the highest court in the land came less than 24 hours after the APC issued its own statement in which it threw caution to the wind, fired a childish arrow at the grand opposition alliance and said unprintable things about the opposition while not addressing the issues raised and making claims of Nigeria being an imaginary one-party state.
“We know of a fact that it is not a coincidence that the two separate statements from the ruling party and the apex court came almost the same time. The releases were clearly syndicated. It is a confirmation of our long-time believe that something sinister is going on.
“They have confirmed that they are both reading from the same book and are on the same page. It is expected that those concerned will be coming out of their holes one after the other because the opposition has exposed them.
The Chief Justice of Nigeria, Tanko Muhammed, has, by this statement smelling of malice and hatred for opposition members, removed his mask and through the Supreme Court attempted to attack the integrity of the opposition grand alliance, the CUPP, and twist facts.
“Nigerians should also note that nowhere in the entire statement did the Supreme Court summon the courage to deny the facts so clearly stated by the opposition, knowing the same to be true and correct.
“So, who are those people with ‘inordinate ambition’ that the Supreme Court is talking about? Is the Court trying to tell us that any of the litigants has inordinate ambition which must not be allowed to see the light of the day?
Has the Supreme already given the judgment of the appeal in a hurry without even constituting a panel? Such a harsh biased comment should not emanate from a highly respected Court as the Supreme Court of Nigeria. The person who made that Statement should know that the Court exists to serve Nigerians and Nigerians have all the rights to share concerns regarding real events that have recently become the norm in our Judiciary.
“If the Spokesperson of the Supreme Court had nothing dignifying to say, the Court should have maintained a respectable silence. Using words like “orchestrated campaign of calumny” has brought the Court to the arena of politics.
“What is expected of any Supreme Court was to simply reassure citizens of its dedication and commitment to do justice, instead of attacking citizens. Is there anything that this Court wants us to do? Does the Supreme Court also want to curtail citizens’ freedom of speech?
If the Court can speak so harshly to citizens for expressing concerns about justice, then we are doomed to accept the gagging of media by the Executive as a normal act. God help us.
“We are therefore assuring those who have made it their new occupation to be attacking the Opposition that they will soon hear from the CUPP on indisputable facts and evidence of abuse of office against them which will put a big question mark to their continued stay in public place.
